Trade.Information

Details of To learn from the experience

To learn dall`esperienza, here an other task that demands to one entity that candid like intelligent. But, banalizing, once recorded the name of mine fornaio in the magnetic memory, mine personal computer is in a position to answering me to the demand: "dimmi as mine calls itself fornaio".

The machine has learned the name, if it remembers it and it answers punctually to the demand opportunely codified. It is not this type of learning that interests to us, will come to me answered from authoritative interlocutors, nevertheless, in nuce, the problem, very to watch, is reassumed dall`esempio previous: it is necessary the recording and the memorization of the new information.

But as information of the all new is possible to generate one? How ago un`informazione to being new and in that sense it is? How we can comprise one new information?

If someone said a new word to me I would have chiedergli to acquire knowledge it since I would only understand it in relation to other words - than already I know - to it correlated. Only in this way riiuscirei to learn one new word: inserting it in a context of relations, of it means to you and of images that with it they have to that to make: one concomitanza of events and synchronizations. It remains however true that the recording dell`informazione is to the base dell`apprendimento of the same one.

A system of rappresentazioni forms them automodificantesi with l`esperienza could be the base for programs of learning in the field automatic dell`elaborazione dell`informazione. The construction of abstract models beginning from concrete rappresentazioni of the objects represents to you, could be the base for the realization of un`intelligenza nearer our criteria of human intelligence.

How make we to separate dall`esperienza our theories on the world? In that way we proceed between l`incertezza and imprecisione of our sensory channels and the perfect intellectual realizations absolutely separated?

One of the aspects that it would appeal to to us had an intelligent computer consists still better in the understanding of the spoken language, if it knew to answer to questions or it showed a sure history understanding that gradually we tell to it.

In a sure measure, the language that we use to our days in order to interact with a calculating is composed from words of the English language and exists already some programs in a position to manipulating with a sure effectiveness phrases and proposizioni, even if is still far from being able to use one natural language like l`inglese in order to interact with a calculating. The computer interprets only some words, commandos who, digita to you through a keyboard, can correctly be recognized and is executed. The transmission channel consists exactly in a keyboard, than of for himself current could generate whichever phrase in a natural language, but that it turns out limited in the sintassi from a series of combinations, relatively to which the calculating is programmed to answer in the just way.

It would appeal to to us to be able to colloquiare with our natural language, to be able to say: "hello calculating, as you are" and to feel to us to even answer: "well, thanks, to that plan we work today".

It is not difficult to program a calculating in order to obtain an answer of this type all`inizio, but the difficult one is to be able to continue the job on this tone for all the functionalities that we wish; very soon the calculating does not comprise us more, it does not hold the step and it begins to answer "wrong commando".

Sure an elaboration of phrases, sintassi, semantic grammar and is still to outside of the abilities to an operating system trades them (for hour at least), is more expeditious to define the more usual operations with short words that identify the commando directly that we want to make to execute to the calculating more rather than to overload with useless to chiacchiere the talk. Online of principle, but, the thing does not seem impossible.

It is necessary to say also that to colloquiare with a stringato language and they to times works introduces sure advantages just from the human point of view: the wordiness of a natural language, in fact, would render the communication long and difficult regarding that we wish to make to make all`elaboratore, also because unavoidablly we wish to execute relatively little programs and we do not choose a computer in order conversare on our last purchases or philosophical problems.